9. Handling of Potential Nonconformances and Challenges to Certifications
9.1 Policy Purpose
This policy establishes processes for identifying, evaluating, and resolving potential nonconformances and formal challenges to certifications issued under the FWS Program.
9.2 Detection and Reporting of Potential Nonconformances
9.2.1 Sources of Nonconformance
Nonconformances may be identified via:
- Surveillance activities (e.g., market sampling, factory audits)
- Complaints or appeals from third parties
- Internal audits or management reviews
9.2.2 Immediate Reporting
Any stakeholder must notify the FWS Program Administrator within two business days of identifying a potential nonconformance.
9.2.3 Classification and Initial Review
Upon receipt, the FWS Program Administrator shall classify the reported issue as:
Minor
No immediate risk to certified properties or certification policy or procedures.
Major
Potential to undermine confidence in certification.
Critical
Immediate risk requiring suspension of certification.
9.3 Assignment for Investigation
Based on classification, the FWS Program Administrator may assign a qualified party to investigate from those not involved in the original certification decision.
9.3.1 Minor Investigation Assignment
FWS Program Administrator may investigate or reassign investigation.
9.3.2 Major Investigation Assignment
FWS Program Administrator assigns to SJRWMD or their recommended FWS Program TIC.
9.3.3 Critical Investigation Assignment
FWS Program Administrator convenes meeting with SJRWMD within 24 hours to inform and acts agreed upon.
9.4 Investigation and Determination
The investigator shall prepare an investigation plan within five working days, outlining:
9.4.1 Scope and Objectives
Clear statement of investigation scope and objectives.
9.4.2 Evidence Collection
Evidence to be collected (records, site visits, interviews).
9.4.3 Applicable Requirements
Applicable requirements or FWS Program policies and procedures.
9.5 Evidence Review
9.5.1 Collection Process
Collect and review all relevant evidence, ensuring impartiality and confidentiality.
9.5.2 Findings and Nonconformance Report
The investigator issues a detailed report including:
- Description of nonconformance
- Root-cause analysis
- Severity classification confirmation
- Recommended corrective actions
9.6 Corrective and Preventive Actions
The FWS Program Administrator and SJRWMD convene to review findings and, within 10 working days, develop an Action Plan specifying:
9.6.1 Corrective Actions
To rectify the nonconformance.
9.6.2 Preventive Actions
To avert recurrence.
9.6.3 Responsibilities and Timelines
Clear assignment of responsibilities and completion timelines.
9.7 Implementation and Verification
9.7.1 Action Implementation
The entities involved implements corrective/preventive actions.
9.7.2 Verification Process
The FWS Program Administrator verifies completion and effectiveness through follow-up audit or inspection.
9.8 Closure
When actions are satisfactorily completed, the FWS Program Administrator formally closes the nonconformance report and updates certification records.
9.9 Suspension, Withdrawal, or Reduction of Certification
9.9.1 Criteria for Suspension/Withdrawal
Certifications may be suspended, reduced in scope, or withdrawn when:
- Critical nonconformances are confirmed
- Corrective actions are not implemented within agreed timelines
9.9.2 Decision Process
SJRWMD reviews major/critical cases and makes final decisions.
Notification
The entity is notified in writing of suspension, reduction, or withdrawal.
Portal Update
Portal is updated accordingly.
9.10 Appeals and Challenges
Entities may submit a formal appeal or challenges to nonconformance actions within 60 days of notification. Appeals must include:
9.10.1 Grounds for Appeal
Clear statement of grounds for appeal.
9.10.2 Supporting Evidence
All supporting evidence.
9.10.3 Appeals Committee
Composition: Composed of individuals not involved in the original investigation or decision assigned by SJRWMD.
Process:
- Reviews the appeal within 20 working days
- May request additional information
Final Determination:
- The Appeals Committee issues a written final determination to uphold, overturn, or modify the prior decision
- All appeal outcomes are final and binding
- Decision is final and binding on all parties
9.11 Challenges to Issued Certifications by Third Parties
9.11.1 Challenge Submission
Any third party (“Challenger”) wishing to challenge the validity of an issued certification must submit a Certification Challenge Request (CCR) to the FWS Program Administrator within 60 days of the date the Certificate of Conformity was issued.
9.11.2 CCR Submission Method
The CCR may be submitted by email but shall include:
- Identification of the certified property and certification scope being challenged
- Detailed grounds for challenge, including any alleged nonconformances or procedural irregularities
- All relevant supporting evidence
9.11.3 Deposit Requirement
A deposit of $500 is required; it will be refunded if the challenge is upheld or retained if it is denied. The FWS Program Administrator will not consider a CCR until the deposit has been received.
9.11.4 Administrative Check
Upon receipt, FWS Program Administrator will perform an administrative completeness check within 5 working days to verify:
- CCR form is fully completed
- Deposit has been received
- Submission is within the 60-day window
Note: Incomplete or late CCRs will be returned without further review, and the deposit will be retained.
9.11.5 Challenge Review Panel
Complete CCRs are forwarded to the Challenge Review Panel, comprised of at least three individuals not involved in the original certification decision.
Acknowledgment: The Panel will acknowledge receipt of the CCR to the Challenger and to the certified entity within 5 working days.
9.12 Review Process
9.12.1 Evidence Review
Review all submitted evidence and may request additional information from either party within 10 working days of acknowledgment.
9.12.2 Interviews and Site Visits
Optionally, conduct interviews or site visits if deemed necessary.
9.12.3 Entity Response
The certified entity has 15 working days from Panel’s request to submit its response and any counterevidence.
9.13 Decision and Deposit Resolution
9.13.1 Decision Timeline
Within 20 working days after receiving the certified entity’s response (or after the initial 15-day response window closes), the Panel will issue a written decision to:
- Uphold the certification, if no sufficient evidence of nonconformance is found
- Modify the certification scope, if limited nonconformances are confirmed
- Suspend or withdraw the certification, if critical nonconformances are confirmed
Note: If no decision is issued within 20 working days, the challenge will be deemed denied.
9.13.2 Deposit Disposition
Challenge Upheld: If the challenge is upheld (i.e., the certification is modified, suspended, or withdrawn), the $500 deposit will be refunded to the Challenger.
Challenge Denied: If the challenge is denied (certification upheld), the $500 deposit will be forfeited to the FWS Program Administrator to offset administrative costs.
9.14 Finality and Record-Keeping
9.14.1 Final Decision
The Panel’s decision is final and binding on both Challenger and certified entity. The decision is final, binding, and not subject to further review.
9.14.2 Documentation Retention
All Challenge Review documentation, including CCRs, evidentiary submissions, and Panel decisions, will be retained in FWS Program records for at least three years.
9.15 Recording and Continual Improvement
9.15.1 Record Retention
All investigation reports, action plans, and appeal records are maintained for at least three years.
9.16 Management Review
9.16.1 Annual Review
Nonconformance trends and appeals outcomes are reviewed annually by SJRWMD to improve FWS Program robustness.